PETA's Pokemon Black/Blue

Just in time when Pokemon Black 2/White 2 was released, PETA decided to make a parody game, called Pokemon Black/Blue, found in PETA's website, here features.peta.org/pokemon-blac…

Now, When I was younger, I watched this episode of South Park, and it showed that PETA was an animal rights group, and wanted protect animals from abuse and stuff, while the 'protagonists' tried to stop them and their doing, which, I believe, that in that episode, PETA was 'saving' veal (baby cows) from a farm by taking them into their custody. Back then, I didn't know much about this so called PETA, so I supported them. I agreed that they should protect animals and stop animal abuse. I wondered why everybody hated PETA...I support animals, and also dislike animal abuse. I'm, in fact, a vegetarian, even before I knew about PETA. I cared about animals with a passion, no matter how big, or small…
What I didn't know back then was that PETA, is not only against animal abuse, but also against animal use. They say you shouldn't have pets, and in their webpage, they stated that they loved their pets, but they think pets shouldn't exist. Talk about a mixed sentence
So now, everybody's like 'Oh my god, PETA is targeting Pokemon' and I'm like 'Huh?', so I gave Pokemon Black/Blue a try. Now, the plot and storyline sucked terribly, and PETA thought of Pokemon wrongly. However, the gameplay, graphics, music, and the other stuff, aside from the plot and storyline, is actually pretty good, for a fan-made game. In the game, you start out as Pikachu, who tries to escape from Trainer Cheren, who is displayed holding a beer bottle and a bloody baseball bat (Yay, alliterations) with spiral eyes, like he was drunk. After defeating Pikachu, Cheren claims that his Tepig is fine, and wants to be with him, and doesn't complain. Pikachu states that he should give Tepig the choice, and Tepig ends up joining the party. Then, Cheren faints, and Pikachu and Tepig walks through the route, encountering a treasure chest, with a video of animal cruelty and abuse inside. How the actual f*ck, is how the way Pokemon is treated by humans, related to how animals are treated by humans?
After displaying that video, you encounter Nurse Joy, and she states that she quit working at the Pokemon Center, because she realizes that humans have been treating Pokemon wrong. Why would she quit? She's the one, in the Pokemon games, that heals Pokemon, with an awesome, magic healing machine. What if a Pokemon was injured by something other than battling? I guess the Pokemon would stay badly hurt, or even die…
Anyways, you then encounter Professor Juniper, who appears with a blood-stained lab coat, holding a lethal injection, possibly. She states that she wants to do tests on Pokemon, while in the actual Pokemon games, professor only studies and examines them, not do lab tests on them. When you defeat her, she states that she now sees that what she does to Pokemon is wrong, and releases her Snivy. Snivy joins the party, Juniper faints, and the Pokemon are on the way, encountering another treasure chest. This time, it contains a Mudkip, who comes out and says 'I herd you like Mudkipz?' Seriously, stop taking the Internet's thing and trying to make yourself famous, PETA. Pikachu then states that he likes all Pokemon, and even though Mudkips are annoying, all Pokemon are still equal. Then, a wild Snorlax appears out of nowhere as the Mudkip gives them a Pokemon Black and Blue wallpaper. The Snorlax and Mudkip disappears, while the Pokemon continue on their way.
You then encounter Ghetsis, leader of Team Plasma, who appears to be wearing a cape with Pokemon skin, and a blood-stained trident and Pikachu states that he thought Ghetsis wanted to help Pokemon become free, but then Ghetsis replied that he just wanted to use Pokemon for their skins and such…After defeating Ghetsis, he sees the faith in the Pokemon, and decides to release his Oshawott. Ghetsis then faints, and the Pokemon continue on their journey. During their travel, Tepig asks, 'So you're saying that Diglett's nose is actually a mouth?', which I thought was pretty clever. They then encounter another treasure chest, with a set of Pokemon Black/Blue Trading cards inside. The Pokemon then continue walking on the route.
Then, you encounter 'your old master, Ash', as he appears wearing a blue and white ringmaster costume, with an evil expression, and he states that Pokemon are used for teaching childen, and Pikachu states that you should teach them respect and stuff, while Ash states that it's not the childen that Ash cared about, it's their parent's wallets. 'Gotta catch 'em all! Ha! What suckers!' He states, making the players think that Pokemon are only used as tools for exploitation and money. After defeating Ash, he states that he sorry, but what should he do to make buttloads of money? Pikachu states that Ash should use human entertainers, or maybe a non-violence thing. Hah, what kind of RPG has no fighting in it?
Then, they encounter a Slowpoke who states that there's a group downtown called Team Plasma, and they are trying to set Pokemon free. The game ends with Pikachu, Tepig, Snivy, and Oshawott dancing and such. The moral of that game was to set your Pokemon free, which, doesn't make much sense, considering that the Pokemon could escape from their trainer any time; I mean, huge fire dragons and electrical mice and legendary beasts versus the trainer?
PETA got Pokemon all wrong; in the episodes, Ash and Pikachu portrayed love and care in EVERY episode. Also, in Mewtwo Strikes Back, Pikachu states to Mewtwo that he's Ash's friend/partner, not a tool. In the manga, the protagonists also care for the Pokemon, and in the games (Ex: Pokemon R/B/Y/G/FR/LG) Professor Oak states to Blue that he lost because he didn't care enough about Pokemon with love, and that implies that Red (you) cared for your Pokemon well.
I'm against PETA, but I'm also against animal abuse. You see, PETA's not just against animal abuse, they're also against animal use. No pets, no partners, no any contact with animals. They're also against breeding in the Pokemon games, because they think it's forced breeding. In the games, you leave two Pokemon in a daycare until they decide to breed, not forced to breed.
I thought you were innocent, PETA, but now I know…
This is the THIRD time, that PETA defamed Nintendo. They first made a parody of Super meat Boy, then Mario (just because he wears a Tanooki suit…come on, seriously? He didn't kill any Tanookis for super powers, he just ate a fricking leaf!), and now, Pokemon.
Defaming is against the law, and Nintendo have the right to sue PETA!
My thoughts,
           D12345t